This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Intel has announced that its near recent BIOS updates for Skylake processors will close a loophole that previously existed. Upwardly until now, multiple motherboard vendors have offered BIOS' that allowed for extensive overclocking of non-K processors.

Ever since Sandy Bridge, Intel has express overclocking to specific products with a "K" in the proper noun — the Cadre i7-2700K, or the Core i7-6700K, to name the first and most recent examples. Non-K processors also sometimes take unlike features than their 1000-course brethren, though this really varies betwixt production lines. Skylake, however, opened a gateway — the Z170 chipset allowed non-Chiliad processors to hit much higher clock speeds, with manufacturers claiming BCLCK (base clock) overclocks of xx-30%.

Intel-Z170-Overclocking

In a argument to PCWorld, Intel confirmed that they're going to shut the practice downward. "Intel regularly problems updates for our processors which our partners voluntarily incorporate into their BIOS," an Intel spokesman said. "The latest update provided to partners includes, among other things, code that aligns with the position that we do non recommend overclocking processors that have not been designed to practise and then. Additionally, Intel does not warranty the operation of the processor beyond its specifications."

Is overclocking risky?

Intel has never liked overclocking very much, and has taken diverse technical steps to disable or limit it across the years. It's absolutely true that overclocking your processor can damage it or shorten its lifespan. One could fence that this concluding point actually matters more information technology used to, since desktops are typically used for longer and longer periods. No one cared nearly killing fries when the boilerplate desktop was replaced every 2-three years, merely if you plan on using a organization for 5-7 years, it could affair more.

Both the P4 "Northwood" core and LGA 1156 processors had known problems when asked to run at extreme voltages and frequencies for meaning periods of fourth dimension. And then aye — overclocking tin can fire out a core.

There is, withal, an of import caveat to this. The scenarios that typically damage a CPU are high-voltage / loftier ability scenarios that result from pushing a core well beyond safe thresholds. If you're trying to squeeze another few hundred MHz out of your CPU and you make a few small voltage tweaks to reach information technology, you probably aren't going to impairment anything.

Information technology's unfortunate to see Intel closing this detail loophole, since enthusiasts have had little enough to get excited about in years. AMD all the same offers some low-end chips with unlocked multipliers, but Intel doesn't (with the exception of the 20th Ceremony Pentium released a few years back). After this update, overclocking volition exist confined to a handful of the more-expensive SKUs in Intel's product lineup.